Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: deploy on mode l2 #198

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

chore: deploy on mode l2 #198

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

DavidMinarsch
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidMinarsch DavidMinarsch commented Oct 16, 2024

  • Deploying light protocol on Mode.

@DavidMinarsch DavidMinarsch changed the title chore: deploy on mode nl2 chore: deploy on mode l2 Oct 16, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.86%. Comparing base (076a6c5) to head (3664c82).
Report is 39 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.86%   98.86%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1853     1853           
  Branches      355      355           
=======================================
  Hits         1832     1832           
  Misses         21       21           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.86% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kupermind kupermind self-requested a review October 16, 2024 16:14
@DavidMinarsch DavidMinarsch merged commit a6a35cf into main Oct 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@DavidMinarsch DavidMinarsch deleted the deploy-mode branch October 17, 2024 05:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants